Texas Suppressor Freedom Lawsuit Revived by Fifth Circuit

The Texas Suppressor Freedom lawsuit, initially dismissed on a technicality, has been granted a reprieve by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. This crucial development reinvigorates the legal challenge against federal suppressor regulations enforced by the National Firearms Act (NFA) and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF).

Initially, the lawsuit, officially titled Paxton v. Richardson, faced a setback in a federal district court. The court’s summary judgment, favoring the ATF, dismissed the case based on the plaintiffs’ lack of standing—a legal requirement for a lawsuit to proceed. This decision focused on technical grounds, avoiding the core constitutional issues raised by the lawsuit.

The heart of the case revolves around Texas House Bill 957, passed with the intent to exempt suppressors manufactured and retained within Texas from federal regulation. The ATF’s stringent response to this bill led to the lawsuit, as Texas sought to assert its rights under the Second Amendment and state sovereignty.

The appeal to the Fifth Circuit represents a significant shift in the legal battle. Known for its favorable rulings on Second Amendment cases, the Fifth Circuit’s involvement could potentially reshape the landscape of federal suppressor regulations. This appellate court’s decision will be pivotal in determining whether Texas-made suppressors can be exempted from the NFA’s reach.

This case is closely watched by Second Amendment advocates and gun owners nationwide, as it challenges the longstanding federal control over suppressor regulation. A favorable ruling for Texas could set a precedent, potentially influencing suppressor laws in other states and at the federal level.

As the legal process continues, the Fifth Circuit’s review of the case will be a critical moment in the ongoing debate over gun rights and state versus federal authority. The outcome of Paxton v. Richardson could have far-reaching implications for the future of suppressor regulation and the broader scope of the Second Amendment.

6 responses to “Texas Suppressor Freedom Lawsuit Revived by Fifth Circuit”

  1. Joseph Avatar

    Are we talking about car or gun noise suppression ? What is the difference (noise/ safety)?

  2. David Woodward Avatar
    David Woodward

    Suppressors are a logical tool for hearing protection and noise pollution, other countries require suppressors be used. It’s ridiculous for them to be illegal in our state.

  3. Charles D. Lamb Avatar
    Charles D. Lamb

    I am in favor or removing the ATF’s draconian regulations on suppressors. They do not not make firearms as quite as depicted in the movies but do go a long way in mitigating damage to one’s hearing.

  4. mgoode Avatar

    State’s Rights need to be revived. The Fed is not doing its duties. The “laws” forbid the states from taking actions that are “reserved” to the Fed. This is ridiculous.

  5. Kerry Phillips Avatar
    Kerry Phillips

    How about a lawsuit that challenges the right of the ATF to regulate anything on their own without it being processed through congress as an actual law?

  6. William Green, Nickname. Avatar
    William Green, Nickname.

    These Tax Stamps of $200 dollars and having to jump thru hoop is a misjustice. Paying over a hundred percent tax for a item that will need to be replaced after a set amount of target rounds. Suppressors in today world is more about a safety issue with protecting hearing. If criminals want to buy or make them, they are not going to pay for Tax Stamp for them. Most Gangs and Criminals what the effect of the noise to make a point. This is just plain overreach. The use of Suppressors in crime has been cited at 3%, but this also includes suppressor that are found in homes of criminal not allowed to own guns, or do not have tax stamps for them. There has also been criminals falsely charged with enhance sentences and charged with using them in a crime when there wasn’t any evidence to prove it. They just own suppressors at their homes without a tax stamp. If the Feds find 5 suppressors in a home; it counts as 5 crimes which raises their false reasoning for the tax stamps.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *