In a landmark decision, Texas Gun Rights and the National Association for Gun Rights have secured a significant victory against the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).
A federal judge delivered a scathing 64-page ruling that struck down the ATF’s controversial forced reset trigger (FRT) ban, marking a crucial win for Second Amendment advocates.
The ban aimed to prohibit the use of forced reset triggers, devices designed to increase the firing rate of semi-automatic weapons. The ATF argued it was necessary to prevent the potential misuse of these devices, while opponents saw it as an overreach of federal authority and a direct infringement on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens.
TXGR and NAGR challenged the ATF’s ban in court, arguing that the forced reset triggers did not constitute machine guns under federal law and that the ban was arbitrary and capricious and violated constitutional rights.
The federal judge’s ruling echoed the arguments presented by TXGR and NAGR. In the 64-page document, the judge criticized the ATF for overstepping its regulatory authority and failing to provide a clear and consistent rationale for the ban.
The ruling emphasized that the ATF’s interpretation of the law was flawed and that the forced reset triggers did not meet the statutory definition of a machine gun.
The striking down of the forced reset trigger ban sets a significant legal precedent. It reinforces the limitations of regulatory agencies and underscores the necessity for laws and regulations to be clearly defined and consistently applied.
Judge O’Connor’s ruling was clear and uncompromising. Drawing upon precedent in numerous other concurrent Second Amendment cases, the judge enjoined the ATF’s redefinition of forced reset triggers as “machine guns.”
The case, NAGR Inc., et al., v. Garland, challenged the federal government’s redefinition of “machine gun” under the National Firearms Act of 1934 to include novel inventions such as the forced reset trigger.
In layman’s terms: the district judge threw out the ATF’s redefinition of new, novel triggers as “machine guns.”
A forced reset trigger (FRT) is an assembly that allows the trigger of a semi-automatic weapon to reset quicker than it would otherwise by using the standard trigger-return spring. Due to the swift trigger reset, a firearm equipped with an FRT enables the user to fire at a faster rate than with a traditional trigger.
The ATF’s Firearms Technology Criminal Branch (FTCB) had issued an open letter in March 2022 advising that some FRTs are considered “machine guns” under the Gun Control Act (GCA).
In his decision, Judge Reed O’Connor stated:
“It is emblematic of a devastating problem that increasingly rears its head in federal courts: rampant evasion of the democratic process. Few issues more acutely underscore this problem than the present case. Our nation would do well to remember the very reasons and spirit that inspired our democratic system of governance in the first place.”
He further noted:
“Each time an agency circumvents the legislative process it chips away at the most prudent reason for the separation of powers, that is, ensuring unelected and unaccountable individuals do not make the law. This reason alone compels the Court’s decision today.”
The decision effectively does the following:
– Vacates the ATF’s classification of FRTs as “machine guns”
– Stops the ATF from enforcing the expanded definition of “machine gun” against certain parties, including plaintiffs, their families, and NAGR members
– Stops the ATF from pursuing criminal proceedings against the plaintiffs
– Orders the ATF to return all confiscated components
– Orders the ATF to mail a letter correcting their previous letter that warned suspected FRT holders that they possessed a “machine gun”
In his closing remarks, Judge O’Connor warned against tyranny:
“Every year, our country commemorates the revolution waged against a tyrannical executive. To safeguard against future tyranny, our founding documents designed a system that prevents undue concentrations of power in order to protect important rights and to ensure that a legislative consensus is reached before enacting laws on the most important issues in society.”
This decision is a monumental victory for the Second Amendment and for the rights of all law-abiding gun owners. We are committed to continuing our fight against any and all attempts to infringe upon our constitutional rights.
While the ruling represents a significant victory, the battle for gun rights is far from over. TXGR and NAGR have vowed to remain vigilant and continue their advocacy, ensuring that the rights of gun owners are protected from undue government overreach.
The summary judgment striking down the ATF’s forced reset trigger ban is a pivotal moment in the ongoing struggle to preserve the Second Amendment. The detailed and emphatic ruling serves as a reminder of the importance of legal clarity and constitutional fidelity in the face of regulatory actions.
Leave a Reply